home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=89TT1147>
- <title>
- May 01, 1989: Evicting The Drug Dealers
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1989
- May 01, 1989 Abortion
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- NATION, Page 41
- Evicting the Drug Dealers
- </hdr><body>
- <p>Kemp's tough action raises constitutional questions
- </p>
- <p> They hang out in parking lots and playgrounds. They
- commandeer vacant apartments. In some cities they have become
- occupying armies, besieging entire housing complexes. They are
- the drug dealers who have terrorized public-housing projects
- since the birth of the crack-cocaine trade. Last week Secretary
- of Housing and Urban Development Jack Kemp announced sweeping
- plans to drive drug dealers out of public housing. But in his
- zeal to attack the drug crisis, Kemp may have ignored serious
- questions of practicality, if not constitutionality.
- </p>
- <p> Kemp has been inspired by the antidrug crusades waged by a
- number of local public-housing authorities. Perhaps the most
- successful effort has been Operation Clean Sweep, which began
- at Chicago's Rockwell Gardens project. Led by the executive
- director of the city's housing authority, Vince Lane, the
- program has provided frequent drug raids by police and has
- planned for tenant security patrols. Anyone entering a building
- is required to present a photo ID at a security desk in the
- lobby. Since the plan was instituted last September, the crime
- rate at Rockwell Gardens has dropped 28%.
- </p>
- <p> Kemp would like to see similar programs at other projects.
- The catch is that he wants to finance them largely with HUD
- funds that have been set aside for modernizing the complexes.
- To pay for the drug war, local housing authorities would have
- to sacrifice the installation of storm windows, new heating
- systems and other badly needed improvements. Robert McKay,
- executive director of the Council of Large Public Housing
- Authorities, complains of being faced with an "impossible choice
- between fixing up dwellings or fighting drugs -- and you have
- to do both." Moreover, housing officials are going to have less
- and less money for either task. HUD modernization funds are
- scheduled to be cut by $649 million next year, to a total of $1
- billion. The cost of rehabilitating public housing across the
- U.S. is estimated at $20 billion. The cost of eradicating drugs
- from the projects is incalculable.
- </p>
- <p> The second component of the antidrug offensive is a tough
- eviction policy that Kemp called for last week. It would speed
- the expulsion of any person convicted, or even suspected, of
- dealing or using drugs. Moreover, anyone who shared the
- apartment with the drug offender could also be ousted. Mary
- Brunette, Kemp's spokeswoman, pooh-poohs the civil liberties
- questions raised by that policy. Says she: "The rights of
- law-abiding families in public housing are at least as important
- as the rights of criminals."
- </p>
- <p> But what about the rights of law-abiding family members
- whose relatives are accused of a drug offense? Should they be
- held culpable for the crime? "We're concerned about those who
- might be innocent and evicted," says Wade Henderson of the
- A.C.L.U. "The next step from public housing for many people is
- homelessness." Kemp's desire to rid the projects of drug dealers
- and encourage parental vigilance is commendable. But the
- strategy he unveiled last week seems likely to provoke legal
- challenges that could hamper its implementation -- and throw
- some innocent tenants out on the street.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-